The gross short-term rental premium is 97% for a 3-bed house in Seattle (King County), but after Airbnb fees, insurance, maintenance, utilities, and property tax, that headline shrinks fast. This article covers both a 3-bed house and a 2-bed apartment because the cost structures differ: apartments add HOA fees but come in at a much lower entry price, and the net yield ranking is not always what the gross numbers suggest.
Seattle is fundamentally a premium, appreciation-led market. Median 3-bed house prices around $1.16m sit well above the national median of about $243,000, and gross long-term rental yields of 2.6% fall short of the national median of 5.3%. Investors here are betting on capital growth and location quality more than monthly cash flow, and the after-costs tables below make that trade-off concrete.
3-Bed House: Net Yield Lands at 1.2% on Short-Term, 0.5% on Long-Term
Below is the self-managed cost stack for a typical Seattle 3-bed house. The short-term column assumes the market-average occupancy of 52% across 330 available nights per year. Both columns assume the owner self-manages.
| Short-term rental | Long-term rental | |
|---|---|---|
| Property price | $1.16m | $1.16m |
| Gross revenue | $51,000 | $26,000 |
| Airbnb fees (15.5%) | $7,900 | — |
| Insurance | $4,500 | $3,000 |
| Maintenance | $13,000 | $13,000 |
| Utilities | $2,700 | $0 |
| Property tax | $8,100 | $8,100 |
| Short-term rental tax | $3,300 | — |
| Total costs | $39,000 | $21,000 |
| Net income | $11,000 | $5,200 |
| Net yield | 1.2% | 0.5% |
Note that Airbnb's host-only fee of 15.5% is platform-specific. Vrbo charges roughly 5% to hosts on a per-booking basis, and Booking.com typically takes around 15% in commission. Direct bookings avoid platform fees entirely, but require the host to handle marketing, payments, and customer service.
What Eats the Short-Term Premium on the House
Airbnb fees and short-term rental tax do most of the damage on costs. Airbnb takes about $7,900 a year off the top, and Washington's combined state and local lodging tax of 6.5% adds about $3,300 more. Together, those two cost lines alone wipe out a meaningful chunk of the gross premium that short-term commands over long-term.
Insurance and maintenance also run higher on short-term: insurance moves from about $3,000 to about $4,500 because short-term carriers price in commercial-grade liability, and the maintenance figure of about $13,000 folds in furnishing replacement on top of routine repairs. Utilities sit on the host's side for short-term but pass through to the tenant on long-term, adding another about $2,700 a year to the short-term cost stack. Property tax of about $8,100 hits both columns equally.
2-Bed Apartment: Lower Entry Price, but HOA Changes the Math
The apartment version of the same exercise looks like this. The HOA row appears in both columns because it is a property-level cost that applies whether the unit is rented short-term or long-term.
| Short-term rental | Long-term rental | |
|---|---|---|
| Property price | $371,000 | $371,000 |
| Gross revenue | $33,000 | $24,000 |
| Airbnb fees (15.5%) | $5,100 | — |
| Insurance | $2,500 | $720 |
| Maintenance | $5,700 | $3,600 |
| Utilities | $2,300 | $460 |
| Property tax | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| Short-term rental tax | $2,200 | — |
| HOA fees | $4,000 | $4,000 |
| Total costs | $25,000 | $12,000 |
| Net income | $8,400 | $12,000 |
| Net yield | 2.3% | 3.2% |
Apartments Lead on Both Net Income and Yield
The apartment entry price of about $371,000 is dramatically lower than the house at about $1.16m, which means a much smaller down payment and a much smaller absolute capital commitment. But the apartment carries an HOA bill of about $4,000 a year that houses do not pay, and HOA is the single biggest swing factor between the two cost stacks. In some Seattle buildings, HOA can include water, garbage, and exterior maintenance, which partially offsets the line item; in others it is mostly building reserves and amenities.
The net yield comparison is the headline most investors care about: short-term apartment net yield comes in at 2.3% versus the house at 1.2%, and on long-term the apartment runs at 3.2% versus the house at 0.5%. Whichever way the comparison falls, the dollar income on a house is larger because the asset is larger; the yield percentage on the apartment can be more efficient because the entry price is lower. Investors trying to maximize total wealth lean toward houses; investors trying to maximize return on capital deployed often prefer apartments.
Short-Term Breaks Even at 27% Occupancy on the House
For the 3-bed house, short-term gross revenue equals the long-term annual rent at roughly 27% occupancy. That is the floor, not the target: it is the occupancy below which short-term loses outright to long-term. The Seattle market median occupancy is 52%, comfortably above the floor, but new listings and off-prime locations frequently run below market median for the first 12 to 18 months while reviews accumulate. Investors modelling a new Seattle short-term should stress-test the cash flow at the lower-occupancy scenario of 37%, where gross revenue falls to about $36,000.
View Seattle in the dashboard → Free preview · every bedroom count and property type
These are county medians across 83 ZIP codes. Individual neighborhoods differ: the highest-yielding ZIP, Seatac (98168), posts a gross long-term yield of 5.0% on a $588,000 entry, while expensive Bellevue ZIPs can yield less than half that. The dashboard shows the suburb-level breakdown for every bedroom count and property type.
For full per-neighborhood filtering and saved scenarios, $19 24-hour access. Get access
Hiring a Manager Nearly Wipes Out Net Yield on Short-Term
The tables above assume the owner self-manages. Most Seattle investors don't, especially on short-term where guest communication, cleaning coordination, and dynamic pricing run as a near-full-time job. Hiring a short-term professional manager adds roughly $10,000 per year for a 3-bed house (typically around 20% of gross revenue), which drops short-term net yield from 1.2% down to 0.1%.
On the long-term side, a property management company typically charges around 8% of collected rent, which drops long-term net yield from 0.5% to 0.3%. Long-term management fees are a smaller dollar drag than short-term simply because the gross revenue base is smaller, but the percentage hit to net yield can be substantial when the starting yield is already thin. Explore rental data in the dashboard to see how management fees affect your specific neighborhood.
Tax Treatment: No State Income Tax, Plus 27.5-Year Depreciation
Washington has no state income tax, so federal treatment dominates the after-tax picture. Rental real estate is reported on Schedule E. Depreciation on the building portion of a residential rental is taken over 27.5 years on a straight-line basis: for the median Seattle 3-bed house, that is roughly $29,000 per year on a depreciable base of around $789,000 (using a 80% building allocation for this market). Land is not depreciable.
Short-term rentals are also subject to Washington's combined lodging tax of 6.5%, which is collected from the guest and remitted to the state and local jurisdictions. Seattle requires a short-term rental operator license, and hosts can rent up to two units (one of which must be a primary residence). See our data sources page for how taxes and regulations are wired into the cost model. After-tax yields depend on mortgage interest, depreciation, and operating expenses being layered in; the dashboard shows these for your specific neighborhood. Always confirm closing costs and transfer taxes with a local real estate attorney or escrow agent before transacting.
Data reflects market conditions as of June 2026.
Take Seattle further in the dashboard
Drill into individual suburbs, run your own price and rent assumptions, and compare property types side-by-side.
Open Seattle →Need full filtering and saved scenarios?
$19 for 24-hour access. All neighborhoods, all property types. Unlock the dashboard
This information is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial or legal advice. Regulations and market conditions change frequently. Verify current rules with local authorities before making investment decisions.
Methodology and Assumptions
Defaults used in the figures above. All inputs are adjustable in the dashboard.
How available nights are determined
Available nights default to 330 per year, reflecting an active operator with minimal blocked time. Where local regulations cap whole-home short-term lets (for example New York City 30-day minimum stays and San Francisco un-hosted 90-night caps), the cap is applied. In markets where short-term rental requires owner-occupancy or is otherwise prohibited for investment properties, available nights drop to zero.
How occupancy is measured
The percentage of available nights that get booked, drawn from market data. A property listed for 200 nights with 100 bookings shows 50% occupancy. Adjustable in the dashboard.
Long-term rental management default
Defaults to self-managed (zero management fee), reflecting the most common arrangement for US individual investors. The dashboard slider lets you add a property manager fee if you plan to outsource.
Short-term rental management default
Set to self-managed (zero management fee) by default, the most common arrangement for individual investors. Hiring a professional manager typically costs around 20% of gross revenue and reduces net yield proportionally. Toggle in the dashboard.
How property tax is calculated
Calculated as a percentage of property value, varying by state and county. California properties show lower effective rates due to Proposition 13's 1% cap on assessed value. Property tax sits with the owner; long-term tenants do not pay it.
Local regulations
Check state, county, and HOA rules before investing; these change frequently. The regulations summary in this article reflects the latest data we hold. Always verify the live position with the local authority.
Sampling and data sources
Short-term rental yield figures reflect properties currently listed on short-term rental platforms. In high-tourism markets, listings tend to concentrate in central postcodes, which can pull city-median yields above what residential areas of the same city would achieve. Yields for any specific suburb may differ significantly from the city-wide median.
For metric definitions and broader methodology, see the About page.