Short-Term or Long-Term Rental in Boston: What the Numbers Show
Verdict: Long-term rental only. Boston bars investor-owned short-term rentals, so the decision is whether a 4.0% gross yield on a roughly $939,000 price tag is a return worth pursuing.
Best For: Long-horizon investors betting on Boston appreciation, with equity to absorb the high price point and patience for thin cash flow.
Scores out of 10 across yield, regulations, tax, risk, and market fundamentals. How we score
Underlying Assumptions (data as of June 2026):
- Property Price: 3-bedroom houses estimated at around $939,000
- Monthly Long-Term Rent: Approximately $3,200
- Regulations: Short-term rentals heavily restricted in Boston. Investment properties generally not permitted; may require owner occupancy, specific zoning, or other conditions (permit required, $200). Boston requires short-term rentals operators to register and restricts rentals to owner-occupied primary residences only. Investment properties and second homes cannot be used for short-term rentals. Source: Airbnb
See your suburb's full short-term rental vs long-term rental breakdown in the dashboard
Long-Term Rental Is the Only Legal Path for Boston Investors
Boston (Suffolk County) has closed the short-term rental door for non-resident owners. The city's 2019 ordinance limits nightly rentals to owner-occupied primary residences, and enforcement has tightened since. An investment property in any of Boston's 34 ZIP codes cannot legally operate on Airbnb or similar platforms, regardless of nightly rate or occupancy potential. That reframes the whole analysis: this article compares a long-term rental path against the alternative of not buying in Boston at all.
Estimates for a typical 3-bedroom house. Short-term rental is not available to investors in this market.
A long-term rental yield of 4.0% gross is well below the US median of 5.3%. Boston's case rests on appreciation and tenant quality, not on current cash flow.
Outer Suffolk ZIPs Outperform Boston Proper on Yield
Boston's headline median hides a wide spread. Across the 29 ranked Suffolk-area neighborhoods in the dataset, gross yields range from around 5.0% at the lower end of the top five to 7.7% in the strongest zip. Investors chasing cash flow gravitate to the city's edges; downtown and brownstone districts trade at sub-3% yields but carry the strongest appreciation history.
| Neighborhood | 3-Bed Price | Monthly Rent | Gross Yield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chelsea (2150) | $458,000 | $2,900/mo | 7.7% |
| Revere (2151) | $645,000 | $3,000/mo | 5.6% |
| East Boston (2128) | $784,000 | $3,500/mo | 5.4% |
| Winthrop (2152) | $707,000 | $3,000/mo | 5.1% |
| Hyde Park (2136) | $685,000 | $2,900/mo | 5.0% |
Chelsea (2150) leads at 7.7%, close to twice the Boston-wide average. That premium reflects lower entry prices (about $458,000) rather than unusually high rents. The trade-off: peripheral neighborhoods have historically lagged Back Bay, South End, and Beacon Hill on capital growth. Investors optimizing for monthly cash flow pick up yield here; those optimizing for appreciation pay up for the downtown core.
These are averages per neighborhood. The dashboard breaks it down further, by bedroom count and property type, so you can model your specific property.
View Boston in the dashboard → Free preview · every bedroom count and property type
See your suburb's full short-term rental vs long-term rental breakdown, with $19 24-hour access. Get access
Boston's Short-Term Rental Ban Explained
Boston's short-term stays ordinance is one of the most restrictive in the country for investor-owned property. Non-owner-occupied listings, whole-unit investment rentals, and second-home rentals are all prohibited on nightly platforms within city limits. Only owner-occupied primary residences can register, and even those must comply with condo rules, zoning restrictions, and a $200 annual registration fee. The practical implication is simple: a buyer acquiring a Boston property purely as an investment has no legal path to short-term rental income.
Allston, Dorchester, and Roxbury Crossing are Boston neighborhoods, so the same restrictions apply within city limits. The state layer plus local taxes totals 11.3% for any property that does qualify. For investors set on nightly rental income, the question is not how to structure around Boston's rules; it is which market to pick instead.
Operating Costs Compress Boston's Already-Thin Yields
Annual gross rent (after vacancy) of about $37,000 looks healthy until the costs arrive. Property tax works out to roughly $6,000 per year on a median-priced 3-bedroom house. Landlord insurance in a coastal, urban market runs around $3,600, and maintenance on Boston's older housing stock (many triple-deckers date from the early 1900s) averages around $8,900. Total long-term rental operating costs come to approximately $19,000 per year.
That leaves net operating income of roughly $18,000, a net yield of 2.0%. If the investor also hires a property manager (Boston's tenant-turnover and code-compliance workload makes this common), add around 8% of gross rent, reducing net yield further. With mortgage interest and depreciation factored in on a tax return, the cash return can turn negative in year one even for fully-priced rentals, which is where the appreciation bet has to pay off.
Tax Implications for Boston Investors
Depreciation is the single biggest structural advantage for Boston long-term rental investors. On a sale price of about $939,000 with a building allocation of around 70%, the depreciable base is approximately $639,000. Applied over the IRS 27.5-year residential schedule, that generates an annual deduction of roughly $23,000. For a high-bracket taxpayer, this deduction alone can convert the modest 2.0% cash yield into a paper loss, shielding other rental or, with material participation and real-estate-professional status, even wage income.
Massachusetts is not a no-income-tax state; it levies a flat 5% on rental net income, rising to 9% under the millionaires' surtax for taxable income above $1 million. Mortgage interest remains fully deductible on Schedule E without the SALT cap that applies to owner-occupiers. A 1031 exchange at exit defers federal and state capital gains if the investor rolls into another qualifying property, a particularly valuable tool in a high-basis market like Boston where long-term gains can be substantial. Investors should confirm specifics with a CPA familiar with Massachusetts rental treatment.
Boston vs Massachusetts and National Benchmarks
Comparison of key long-term rental metrics.
| Metric | Boston | Massachusetts Avg | US Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Bed Sale Price | $939,000 | $620,000 | $243,000 |
| Monthly Rent | $3,200/mo | $1,700/mo | $1,100/mo |
| Gross Yield (Long-Term Rental) | 4.0% | 3.4% | 5.3% |
Boston sits well above both the state and national benchmarks on price and rent, but yield lands in the middle: above the Massachusetts average (pulled down by suburban and rural towns) and below the US median. That pattern is consistent with a premium coastal metro: the return is priced for growth and tenant quality, not for headline yield. Investors looking for purely cash-flow-led returns typically look outside Suffolk County. For comparison with a lower-priced Massachusetts alternative, Springfield ZIP 01103 (Metro Center) offers roughly $300,000 entry prices and yields around 9%, while other Springfield ZIPs span a wider range that often clears Boston's level even when it lands short of the national median.
Alternative Massachusetts Markets Where Short-Term Rental Is Allowed
Franklin County and the western portion of the state are more permissive. Rural zip codes including Millers Falls, Heath, Colrain, Erving, and Wendell host nightly rentals without Boston's owner-occupancy requirement. Typical 3-bedroom entry prices in those markets sit around $250,000, with nightly rates near $270. Gross short-term rental yields modelled at those inputs land in the 15-17% range, an order of magnitude above Boston's long-term rental yield, though demand is thinner and seasonality sharper. Similar dynamics apply in other Western Massachusetts counties.
The state-level tax framework still applies: Massachusetts 5.7% room occupancy tax, plus local option taxes of up to 6%, plus community impact fees where adopted. Registration with the state is mandatory for short-term rentals regardless of location. The trade-off between Boston long-term rental and a rural Massachusetts short-term rental is not just yield; it is the difference between a dense-demand urban metro with appreciation upside and a seasonal tourism market with cash flow but limited exit liquidity. These alternative markets offer higher cash flow but with thinner demand and sharper seasonality.
Investment Bottom Line
Boston is a long-term rental market by force of regulation and a long-hold market by force of economics. Gross yield of 4.0% is acceptable in the context of Massachusetts, below par nationally, and only attractive once appreciation, depreciation, and Boston's genuinely durable tenant demand are factored in. The peripheral Suffolk neighborhoods deliver the best cash flow within the region; downtown delivers the strongest capital growth. Short-term rental is not something an operator can adjust in Boston proper.
| Investor Type | Fit |
|---|---|
| Cash Flow Focused | Fair (only in peripheral suburbs) |
| Appreciation Focused | Excellent |
| Short-Term Rental Operator | Not Viable |
| High Leverage (80%+ LTV) | Poor |
Data reflects market conditions as of June 2026. For methodology details, see our market score methodology and data sources. Explore the Massachusetts state view at Massachusetts rental market insights or explore rental data in the dashboard for suburb-level figures across every bedroom count and property type.
Take Boston further in the dashboard
Drill into individual suburbs, run your own price and rent assumptions, and compare property types side-by-side.
Open Boston →See your suburb's full short-term rental vs long-term rental breakdown
$19 for 24-hour access. All suburbs, all property types. Unlock the dashboard
This information is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial or legal advice. Regulations and market conditions change frequently. Verify current rules with local authorities before making investment decisions.
Methodology and Assumptions
Defaults used in the figures above. All inputs are adjustable in the dashboard.
How available nights are determined
Available nights default to 330 per year, reflecting an active operator with minimal blocked time. Where local regulations cap whole-home short-term lets (for example New York City 30-day minimum stays and San Francisco un-hosted 90-night caps), the cap is applied. In markets where short-term rental requires owner-occupancy or is otherwise prohibited for investment properties, available nights drop to zero.
How occupancy is measured
The percentage of available nights that get booked, drawn from market data. A property listed for 200 nights with 100 bookings shows 50% occupancy. Adjustable in the dashboard.
Long-term rental management default
Defaults to self-managed (zero management fee), reflecting the most common arrangement for US individual investors. The dashboard slider lets you add a property manager fee if you plan to outsource.
Short-term rental management default
Set to self-managed (zero management fee) by default, the most common arrangement for individual investors. Hiring a professional manager typically costs around 20% of gross revenue and reduces net yield proportionally. Toggle in the dashboard.
How property tax is calculated
Calculated as a percentage of property value, varying by state and county. California properties show lower effective rates due to Proposition 13's 1% cap on assessed value. Property tax sits with the owner; long-term tenants do not pay it.
Local regulations
Check state, county, and HOA rules before investing; these change frequently. The regulations summary in this article reflects the latest data we hold. Always verify the live position with the local authority.
Sampling and data sources
Short-term rental yield figures reflect properties currently listed on short-term rental platforms. In high-tourism markets, listings tend to concentrate in central postcodes, which can pull city-median yields above what residential areas of the same city would achieve. Yields for any specific suburb may differ significantly from the city-wide median.
For metric definitions and broader methodology, see the About page.